<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>iPhoneVenue &#187; &#187; App Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iphonevenue.com/category/app-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iphonevenue.com</link>
	<description>everything iPhone!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Says Apple Did Reject Google Voice from App Store</title>
		<link>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/lifehacker/google-apple-reject-google-voice-app-store/</link>
		<comments>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/lifehacker/google-apple-reject-google-voice-app-store/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[App Development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lifehacker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphonevenue.com/?p=7634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, Google, Apple, and AT&#38;T all handed over statements to the FCC regarding the alleged rejection of Google Voice from the iTunes App Store. Apple claimed that they&#8217;d never rejected it to begin with, while Google redacted their one answer that might shed light on things. Well, now Google&#8217;s dishing the complete letter, which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/09/thumb160x_Bad_Apple.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" title="Google Says Apple Did Reject Google Voice from App Store" alt="thumb160x_Bad_Apple Google Says Apple Did Reject Google Voice from App Store" />Last month, Google, Apple, and AT&amp;T all <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5342975/google-apple-and-att-all-make-their-statements-to-the-fcc-over-google-voice">handed over statements to the FCC</a> regarding the alleged rejection of Google Voice from the iTunes App Store. Apple claimed that they&#8217;d never rejected it to begin with, while Google redacted their one answer that might shed light on things. Well, now Google&#8217;s dishing <a href="http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/09/our-complete-letter-to-fcc-regarding.html">the complete letter</a>, which does in fact state that Apple rejected Google Voice from the App Store, as well as Google Latitude, which they worried would replace the core Maps app because it had features Maps didn&#8217;t. In short, it definitely seems like there&#8217;s <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5324724/bad-apple-an-argument-against-buying-an-iphone">a bad apple in this bunch</a>. [<a href="http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/09/our-complete-letter-to-fcc-regarding.html">Google Public Policy Blog</a> via <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5362635/google-apples-a-liar-did-reject-google-voice-iphone-app">Gizmodo</a>]</p>
<p><strong>From Lifehacker: iPhone.</strong>  Please <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5362710/google-says-apple-did-reject-google-voice-from-app-store">read the complete</a> article and let us know what you think below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/lifehacker/google-apple-reject-google-voice-app-store/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Introduces App Store Resource Center for iPhone Developers</title>
		<link>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/macrumors/apple-introduces-app-store-resource-center-iphone-developers/</link>
		<comments>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/macrumors/apple-introduces-app-store-resource-center-iphone-developers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 02:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[App Development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MacRumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphonevenue.com/?p=7623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an e-mail sent today to registered iPhone developers, Apple announced the introduction of the App Store Resource Center (iPhone developer membership required), a new site within the iPhone Dev Center dedicated to assisting developers with the App &#8230;
From MacRumors : Mac News and Rumors.  Please read the complete article and let us know [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an e-mail sent today to registered iPhone developers, Apple announced the introduction of the App Store Resource Center (iPhone developer membership required), a new site within the iPhone Dev Center dedicated to assisting developers with the App &#8230;</p>
<p><strong>From MacRumors : Mac News and Rumors.</strong>  Please <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/09/18/apple-introduces-app-store-resource-center-for-iphone-developers/">read the complete</a> article and let us know what you think below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/macrumors/apple-introduces-app-store-resource-center-iphone-developers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Says No More Promo Codes For Apps With Unfiltered Web Content</title>
		<link>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/iphonealleycom/apple-promo-codes-apps-unfiltered-web-content/</link>
		<comments>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/iphonealleycom/apple-promo-codes-apps-unfiltered-web-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[App Development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iPhoneAlley.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphonevenue.com/?p=5612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
TUAW writes that Apple is no longer providing app developers with promo codes if their app is rated for ages 17 and over. The problem is that this not only applies to the slew of adult apps that have been pouring in to the App Store in recent months, but it also includes all applications [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.iphonealley.com/images/storyimages/appstore.jpg" align="right" title="Apple Says No More Promo Codes For Apps With Unfiltered Web Content" alt="appstore Apple Says No More Promo Codes For Apps With Unfiltered Web Content" /></p>
<p>TUAW writes that Apple is no longer providing app developers with promo codes if their app is rated for ages 17 and over. The problem is that this not only applies to the slew of adult apps that have been pouring in to the App Store in recent months, but it also includes all applications that provide unfiltered content from the web distributed by other people, which as Marco Arment <a href="http://www.marco.org/143239041" target="_blank">points out</a> includes Instapaper, all Tumblr and Twitter clients, RSS readers, IM clients, social networking clients, and the majority of eBook readers. </p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/iphonealley/sitewide/~4/It0MIgT-2Uo" height="1" width="1" title="Apple Says No More Promo Codes For Apps With Unfiltered Web Content" alt=" Apple Says No More Promo Codes For Apps With Unfiltered Web Content" /></p>
<p><strong>From iPhone Alley - RSS.</strong>  Please <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/iphonealley/sitewide/~3/It0MIgT-2Uo/apple-says-no-more-promo-codes-for-apps-with-web-content">read the complete</a> article and let us know what you think below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/iphonealleycom/apple-promo-codes-apps-unfiltered-web-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News: App re-downloads restricted in iPhone OS 3.0?</title>
		<link>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/ilounge/news-app-redownloads-restricted-iphone-os-30/</link>
		<comments>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/ilounge/news-app-redownloads-restricted-iphone-os-30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[App Development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iLounge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphonevenue.com/?p=4158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ability of users to re-download previously purchased apps over-the-air may be restricted in iPhone OS 3.0, according to a new report. Currently, users may purchase and then re-download applications an infinite number of times across multiple devices. Mac Rumors has posted a screenshot showing a new iPhone OS dialog box which informs the user [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ability of users to re-download previously purchased apps over-the-air may be restricted in iPhone OS 3.0, according to a new report. Currently, users may purchase and then re-download applications an infinite number of times across multiple devices. Mac Rumors has posted a screenshot showing a new iPhone OS dialog box which informs the user that they’ve already purchased the item, and that they can download the app for free on their computer…
<div>
<a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/ilounge?a=bROu-xpshXo:J7tXvhVdmvg:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/ilounge?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0" title="News: App re downloads restricted in iPhone OS 3.0?" alt=" News: App re-downloads restricted in iPhone OS 3.0?" /></img></a> <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/ilounge?a=bROu-xpshXo:J7tXvhVdmvg:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/ilounge?i=bROu-xpshXo:J7tXvhVdmvg:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0" title="News: App re downloads restricted in iPhone OS 3.0?" alt=" News: App re-downloads restricted in iPhone OS 3.0?" /></img></a>
</div>
<p><strong>From iLounge | All Things iPod, iPhone, iTunes and beyond.</strong>  Please <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ilounge/~3/bROu-xpshXo/">read the complete</a> article and let us know what you think below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/ilounge/news-app-redownloads-restricted-iphone-os-30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eucalyptus E-Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store</title>
		<link>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/theiphoneblogcom/eucalyptus-ebook-reader-approved-app-store/</link>
		<comments>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/theiphoneblogcom/eucalyptus-ebook-reader-approved-app-store/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 14:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[App Development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[theiphoneblog.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphonevenue.com/?p=3925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This time, same as the last time, the initial, stupefying rejection of e-book reader Eucalyptus has been followed up by web outrage and now App Store acceptance. (Can we officially call these the 4 stages of App Store grief&#8217;ing now?) From developer Montgomerie&#8217;s blog (via Macworld):

Earlier today I received a phone call from an Apple [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/images/stories/2009/05/picture-14-400x266.png" alt="Eucalyptus e-book reader" width="400" height="266" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-8714" title="Eucalyptus E Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" /></p>
<p>This time, same as the <a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/03/10/tweetie-13-approved-app-store/">last time</a>, the initial, stupefying rejection of e-book reader <a href="http://th.ingsmadeoutofotherthin.gs/eucalyptus/">Eucalyptus</a> has been followed up by web outrage and now App Store acceptance. (Can we officially call these the 4 stages of App Store grief&#8217;ing now?) From developer <a href="http://www.blog.montgomerie.net/hither-eucalyptus">Montgomerie&#8217;s blog</a> (via Macworld):</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Earlier today I received a phone call from an Apple representative. He was very complimentary about Eucalyptus. We talked about the confusion surrounding its App Store rejections, which I am happy to say is now fully resolved. He invited me to re-build and submit a version of Eucalyptus with no filters for immediate approval, and that full version is <a href="http://tr.im/ptus">now available on the iPhone App Store</a>. [$9.99 - iTunes link]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Eucalyptus provides a pretty amazing UI through which to access all the free content at Project Gutenberg. If you enjoy classic literature and drop-dead gorgeous iPhone interaction, check it out and let us know what you think!</p>
<p>This is a story by <a href="http://theiphoneblog.com">the iPhone Blog</a>.  This feed is sponsored by <a href="http://store.wmexperts.com">The iPhone Blog Store</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/24/eucalyptus-ebook-reader-approved-app-store/">Eucalyptus E-Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store</a></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jyZ5LPnRVXY3DosmDM4EaXbTLxs/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jyZ5LPnRVXY3DosmDM4EaXbTLxs/0/di" border="0" title="Eucalyptus E Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" alt=" Eucalyptus E-Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" /></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jyZ5LPnRVXY3DosmDM4EaXbTLxs/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jyZ5LPnRVXY3DosmDM4EaXbTLxs/1/di" border="0" title="Eucalyptus E Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" alt=" Eucalyptus E-Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" /></img></a></p>
<div>
<a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?a=dAm_sGvYG-M:olzfgexDo2U:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0" title="Eucalyptus E Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" alt=" Eucalyptus E-Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" /></img></a> <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?a=dAm_sGvYG-M:olzfgexDo2U:dnMXMwOfBR0"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0" title="Eucalyptus E Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" alt=" Eucalyptus E-Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" /></img></a> <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?a=dAm_sGvYG-M:olzfgexDo2U:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?i=dAm_sGvYG-M:olzfgexDo2U:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0" title="Eucalyptus E Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" alt=" Eucalyptus E-Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" /></img></a> <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?a=dAm_sGvYG-M:olzfgexDo2U:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?i=dAm_sGvYG-M:olzfgexDo2U:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0" title="Eucalyptus E Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" alt=" Eucalyptus E-Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" /></img></a> <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?a=dAm_sGvYG-M:olzfgexDo2U:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?i=dAm_sGvYG-M:olzfgexDo2U:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0" title="Eucalyptus E Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" alt=" Eucalyptus E-Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" /></img></a> <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?a=dAm_sGvYG-M:olzfgexDo2U:wF9xT3WuBAs"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?i=dAm_sGvYG-M:olzfgexDo2U:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0" title="Eucalyptus E Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" alt=" Eucalyptus E-Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" /></img></a> <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?a=dAm_sGvYG-M:olzfgexDo2U:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0" title="Eucalyptus E Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" alt=" Eucalyptus E-Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" /></img></a> <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?a=dAm_sGvYG-M:olzfgexDo2U:l6gmwiTKsz0"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0" title="Eucalyptus E Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" alt=" Eucalyptus E-Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" /></img></a> <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?a=dAm_sGvYG-M:olzfgexDo2U:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0" title="Eucalyptus E Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" alt=" Eucalyptus E-Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" /></img></a>
</div>
<p><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~r/TheIphoneBlog/~4/dAm_sGvYG-M" height="1" width="1" title="Eucalyptus E Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" alt=" Eucalyptus E-Book Reader Now Approved, Available in App Store" /></p>
<p><strong>From The iPhone Blog.</strong>  Please <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIphoneBlog/~3/dAm_sGvYG-M/">read the complete</a> article and let us know what you think below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/theiphoneblogcom/eucalyptus-ebook-reader-approved-app-store/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News: Apple rejects book reader Eucalyptus over content</title>
		<link>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/ilounge/news-apple-rejects-book-reader-eucalyptus-content/</link>
		<comments>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/ilounge/news-apple-rejects-book-reader-eucalyptus-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[App Development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iLounge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphonevenue.com/?p=3859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple has rejected yet another iPhone reading application over “explicit content,” despite the fact that the same content is offered in other currently-available apps, as well as online. iPhone developer Jamie Montgomerie has posted a blog entry chronicling his communications with Apple over the rejection of Eucalyptus, his book reader app that taps into Project [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple has rejected yet another iPhone reading application over “explicit content,” despite the fact that the same content is offered in other currently-available apps, as well as online. iPhone developer Jamie Montgomerie has posted a blog entry chronicling his communications with Apple over the rejection of Eucalyptus, his book reader app that taps into Project Gutenberg, a producer of free electronic books that offers more than 28,000…
<div>
<a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/ilounge?a=RTZxdhTXX_k:GFQDk9klAYs:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/ilounge?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0" title="News: Apple rejects book reader Eucalyptus over content" alt=" News: Apple rejects book reader Eucalyptus over content" /></img></a> <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/ilounge?a=RTZxdhTXX_k:GFQDk9klAYs:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/ilounge?i=RTZxdhTXX_k:GFQDk9klAYs:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0" title="News: Apple rejects book reader Eucalyptus over content" alt=" News: Apple rejects book reader Eucalyptus over content" /></img></a>
</div>
<p><strong>From iLounge | All Things iPod, iPhone, iTunes and beyond.</strong>  Please <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ilounge/~3/RTZxdhTXX_k/">read the complete</a> article and let us know what you think below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/ilounge/news-apple-rejects-book-reader-eucalyptus-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OS 3.0 Compatibility  Now Required For All App Store Submissions</title>
		<link>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/iphonealleycom/os-30-compatibility-required-app-store-submissions/</link>
		<comments>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/iphonealleycom/os-30-compatibility-required-app-store-submissions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 02:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[App Development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iPhoneAlley.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphonevenue.com/?p=3434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
As of yesterday, Apple is now requiring all apps and app updates submitted to the App Store for approval to be OS 3.0-compatible. Apps in the App Store that have not yet been updated when the new OS is released will be removed from the App Store. Apple sent the announcement out in an email [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.iphonealley.com/images/storyimages/appstore.jpg" align="right" title="OS 3.0 Compatibility  Now Required For All App Store Submissions" alt="appstore OS 3.0 Compatibility  Now Required For All App Store Submissions" /></p>
<p>As of yesterday, Apple is now requiring all apps and app updates submitted to the App Store for approval to be OS 3.0-compatible. Apps in the App Store that have not yet been updated when the new OS is released will be removed from the App Store. Apple sent the announcement out in an email to registered developers yesterday. The new requirement is to ensure that all apps in the app store will be compatible with the new OS when it is released at WWDC this June. Full text after the break. </p>
<p><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~r/iphonealley/sitewide/~4/tDNuCvzML2M" height="1" width="1" title="OS 3.0 Compatibility  Now Required For All App Store Submissions" alt=" OS 3.0 Compatibility  Now Required For All App Store Submissions" /></p>
<p><strong>From iPhone Alley - RSS.</strong>  Please <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/iphonealley/sitewide/~3/tDNuCvzML2M/os-30-compatibility-now-required-for-all-app-store-apps">read the complete</a> article and let us know what you think below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/iphonealleycom/os-30-compatibility-required-app-store-submissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone Beta 5 Odds and Ends: No More MMS, Better YouTube?</title>
		<link>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/gizmodo/iphone-beta-5-odds-ends-mms-youtube/</link>
		<comments>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/gizmodo/iphone-beta-5-odds-ends-mms-youtube/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[App Development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Gizmodo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphonevenue.com/?p=3378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The official script may have minimized it as a maintenance release, but some users are finding out that iPhone Beta 5 contains more than bugfixes. So far: YouTube&#8217;s improved, and hacked MMS is no more.
The guys at winandmac say they&#8217;ve noticed a change in the YouTube app&#8217;s stream handling. Now, instead of defaulting to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/iphone_os_b5.jpg" width="400" height="295" style="display:block;" title="iPhone Beta 5 Odds and Ends: No More MMS, Better YouTube?" alt="iphone_os_b5 iPhone Beta 5 Odds and Ends: No More MMS, Better YouTube?" />The official script may have minimized it as a maintenance release, but some users are finding out that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5243450/iphone-os-30-beta-5-is-out-now">iPhone Beta 5</a> contains more than bugfixes. So far: YouTube&#8217;s improved, and hacked MMS is no more.</p>
<p>The guys at <a href="http://www.winandmac.com/news/iphone-os-30-beta-5-finally-provides-crystal-clear-youtube-videos-on-3g-connection/">winandmac</a> say they&#8217;ve noticed a change in the <a title="Click here to read more posts tagged YOUTUBE APP" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/youtube-app/">YouTube app</a>&#8217;s stream handling. Now, instead of defaulting to the low-res OTA version of a YouTube video when connected via 3G, the app plays the high-res version previously reserved for Wi-Fi.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, in <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5243450/iphone-os-30-beta-5-is-out-now">our comments</a> and over at <a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/06/iphone-30-beta-5-mms-hidden-att-devs/">the iPhone Blog</a>, AT&amp;T-bound <a title="Click here to read more posts tagged BETA 5" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/beta-5/">Beta 5</a> users are reporting that the simple <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5202406/how-to-enable-mms-in-iphone-30-right-now">MMS stopgap hack</a> is no longer possible.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s only been few hours since Beta 5 burst forth into this world, naked and screaming, so more changes are bound to bubble up to the surface&mdash;there are already rumblings that new anti-tethering measures have been implemented, but this hasn&#8217;t been confirmed (and may have more to do with new security features in iTunes 8.2 than <a title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPHONE OS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-os/">iPhone OS</a>). [<a href="http://www.winandmac.com/news/iphone-os-30-beta-5-finally-provides-crystal-clear-youtube-videos-on-3g-connection/">winandmac</a> and <a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/06/iphone-30-beta-5-mms-hidden-att-devs/">the iPhone Blog</a>]</p>
<p><strong>From Gizmodo: iPhone.</strong>  Please <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5243717/iphone-beta-5-odds-and-ends-no-more-mms-better-youtube">read the complete</a> article and let us know what you think below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/gizmodo/iphone-beta-5-odds-ends-mms-youtube/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Caves In: NIN&#8217;s iPhone App Approved Without Alteration</title>
		<link>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-apps/apple-caves-nins-iphone-app-approved-alteration/</link>
		<comments>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-apps/apple-caves-nins-iphone-app-approved-alteration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[App Development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Gizmodo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iPhone Apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphonevenue.com/?p=3381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Straight from the twitter account of the man himself, the NIN iPhone app has been approved and will be available sometime later today &#8220;unchanged&#8221; from the version that Apple found objectionable.
So, it appears that Apple has caved in to the criticism, further illustrating that their approval system is all kinds of messed up. All that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/DWS_02.jpg" width="504" height="449" style="display:block;" title="Apple Caves In: NINs iPhone App Approved Without Alteration" alt="DWS_02 Apple Caves In: NINs iPhone App Approved Without Alteration" />Straight from the <a href="http://twitter.com/trent_reznor">twitter account of the man himself</a>, the <a title="Click here to read more posts tagged NIN IPHONE APP" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nin-iphone-app/">NIN iPhone app</a> has been approved and will be available sometime later today &#8220;unchanged&#8221; from <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5237936/heresy-apple-rejects-trent-reznors-nin-iphone-app-update-for-objectionable-content">the version that Apple found objectionable</a>.</p>
<p>So, it appears that Apple has <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5238936/trent-reznor-on-app-store-hypocrisy-mobile-oses">caved in to the criticism</a>, further illustrating that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5223320/apples-shaky-standards-baby-shaker-iphone-app-approved-quickly-yanked">their approval system is all kinds of messed up</a>. All that aside, I&#8217;m just happy it&#8217;s on it&#8217;s way. [<a href="http://twitter.com/trent_reznor">Twitter</a>]</p>
<p><strong>From Gizmodo: iPhone.</strong>  Please <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5244440/apple-caves-in-nins-iphone-app-approved-without-alteration">read the complete</a> article and let us know what you think below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-apps/apple-caves-nins-iphone-app-approved-alteration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?</title>
		<link>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/theiphoneblogcom/iphone-30-parental-controls-change-app-store-rejection-policies/</link>
		<comments>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/theiphoneblogcom/iphone-30-parental-controls-change-app-store-rejection-policies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 11:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[App Development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[theiphoneblog.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphonevenue.com/?p=3238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
With all of the rejections in the App Store going on as of late it&#8217;s about time we have some good news for our pal Trent Reznor - see link above - and all of the developers out there. 
It seems that Apple has rejected a newspaper reading app, Newspaper(s) [iTunes Link],  for containing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/images/stories/2009/03/app_store_church_lady.jpg"><img src="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/images/stories/2009/03/app_store_church_lady-400x300.jpg" alt="app_store_church_lady-400x300 iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" width="400" height="300" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-7433" title="iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" /></a></p>
<p>With all of the <a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/03/inch-nails-update-app-rejected/">rejections in the App Store going on as of late</a> it&#8217;s about time we have some good news for our pal Trent Reznor - see link above - and all of the developers out there. </p>
<p>It seems that Apple has rejected a newspaper reading app, <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=300737848&amp;mt=8">Newspaper(s)</a> [iTunes Link],  for containing objectionable content. This app contains newspapers from around the world and one of them has a picture of a topless woman. Apple, however, let the developer know in it&#8217;s rejection email that Parental Controls have been announced for iPhone OS 3.0 and that it “would be appropriate to resubmit your application for review once this feature is available.” </p>
<p>So there you have it folks. Will these new parental control features (see them in our <a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/04/14/iphone-30-beta-3-inapp-purchase-restriction-setting/">iPhone 3.0 Walkthrough</a>) help cut down on rejected apps or will we still see these types of rejections take place? Sound off in the comments!</p>
<p>[<em>Via <a href="http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/news/comments/apple-rejects-newspaper-reading-app-over-content/">iLounge</a></em>]</p>
<p>This is a story by <a href="http://theiphoneblog.com">the iPhone Blog</a>.  This feed is sponsored by <a href="http://store.wmexperts.com">The iPhone Blog Store</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/05/app-store-rejection-iphone-30/">iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?</a></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ktGqVO18N3vocv0yD48yxV1oXn0/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ktGqVO18N3vocv0yD48yxV1oXn0/0/di" border="0" title="iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" alt=" iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" /></img></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ktGqVO18N3vocv0yD48yxV1oXn0/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ktGqVO18N3vocv0yD48yxV1oXn0/1/di" border="0" title="iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" alt=" iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" /></img></a></p>
<div>
<a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?a=W6RRvXuyUas:LoWNd7oBzXI:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0" title="iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" alt=" iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" /></img></a> <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?a=W6RRvXuyUas:LoWNd7oBzXI:dnMXMwOfBR0"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0" title="iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" alt=" iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" /></img></a> <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?a=W6RRvXuyUas:LoWNd7oBzXI:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?i=W6RRvXuyUas:LoWNd7oBzXI:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0" title="iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" alt=" iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" /></img></a> <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?a=W6RRvXuyUas:LoWNd7oBzXI:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?i=W6RRvXuyUas:LoWNd7oBzXI:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0" title="iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" alt=" iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" /></img></a> <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?a=W6RRvXuyUas:LoWNd7oBzXI:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?i=W6RRvXuyUas:LoWNd7oBzXI:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0" title="iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" alt=" iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" /></img></a> <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?a=W6RRvXuyUas:LoWNd7oBzXI:wF9xT3WuBAs"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?i=W6RRvXuyUas:LoWNd7oBzXI:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0" title="iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" alt=" iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" /></img></a> <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?a=W6RRvXuyUas:LoWNd7oBzXI:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0" title="iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" alt=" iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" /></img></a> <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?a=W6RRvXuyUas:LoWNd7oBzXI:l6gmwiTKsz0"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0" title="iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" alt=" iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" /></img></a> <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?a=W6RRvXuyUas:LoWNd7oBzXI:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheIphoneBlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0" title="iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" alt=" iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" /></img></a>
</div>
<p><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~r/TheIphoneBlog/~4/W6RRvXuyUas" height="1" width="1" title="iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" alt=" iPhone 3.0: Parental Controls May Change App Store Rejection Policies?" /></p>
<p><strong>From The iPhone Blog.</strong>  Please <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIphoneBlog/~3/W6RRvXuyUas/">read the complete</a> article and let us know what you think below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iphonevenue.com/iphone-blogs/theiphoneblogcom/iphone-30-parental-controls-change-app-store-rejection-policies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
